JUNG RWM100WW Benutzerhandbuch

Seite 48

Advertising
background image

48

of the device, but also onto the surfaces of

the optical sensor components of the smoke

alarm device. Particularly there, the adhesion

of condensates leads to the premature impair-

ment of the optical properties of the sensor

components, which the smoke alarm device

can only compensate by means of autonomous

recalibration within the physical limits.

Moisture damage/corrosion:

If the smoke alarm device, and particularly its

electronics, is damaged by moisture of any

kind, it leads to the loss of all warranty claims.

Moisture is not only the exposure to a fluid,

but also the constant exposure of the device

to excessive air humidity (> 70%), because

exposure to excessive humidity (e.g. steam/

cooking vapor) drains the battery on the one

hand, thus significantly shortening the battery

life. On the other hand, fluids and high humidity

can damage the electronics of the smoke alarm

device by causing corrosion.

Thermal damage:

If the smoke alarm device is exposed to a tem-

perature below 0°C or above 70°C briefly or

constantly, it leads to the loss of all warranty

claims. In particular, no warranty is given for

devices that were exposed to high temper-

atures and flue gases during a fire. Damage

to the device resulting from frost/cold, are

not covered by the warranty, the same as

heat damage.

Excessive load on the battery:

The excessive load on the battery capacity due

to the frequent triggering of signal tones (more

than once a month) can due to the associated

battery-consumption lead to premature con-

sumption of the battery capacity, and the con-

comitant loss of any relevant warranty claims.

Please verify on your part, prior to asserting

a warranty claim, whether at least one of the

above grounds for warranty exclusion is given,

and you should moreover in the case of the

assertion of a warranty claim also ensure that

there are sufficient technical capabilities availa-

ble that can be used to determine, if the smoke

alarm device was really treated as intended

and therefore whether the warranty claim is

as such justified or unjustified.

Advertising